Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(4)2021 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1110412

ABSTRACT

There is currently not sufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of face shields for source control. In order to evaluate the comparative barrier performance effect of face masks and face shields, we used an aerosol generator and a particle counter to evaluate the performance of the various devices in comparable situations. We tested different configurations in an experimental setup with manikin heads wearing masks (surgical type I), face shields (22.5 cm high with overhang under the chin of 7 cm and circumference of 35 cm) on an emitter or a receiver manikin head, or both. The manikins were face to face, 25 cm apart, with an intense particle emission (52.5 L/min) for 30 s. The particle counter calculated the total cumulative particles aspirated on a volume of 1.416 L In our experimental conditions, when the receiver alone wore a protection, the face shield was more effective (reduction factor = 54.8%), while reduction was lower with a mask (reduction factor = 21.8%) (p = 0.002). The wearing of a protective device by the emitter alone reduced the level of received particles by 96.8% for both the mask and face shield (p = NS). When both the emitter and receiver manikin heads wore a face shield, the protection allowed for better results in our experimental conditions: 98% reduction for the face shields versus 97.3% for the masks (p = 0.01). Face shields offered an even better barrier effect than the mask against small inhaled particles (<0.3 µm-0.3 to 0.5 µm-0.5 to 1 µm) in all configurations. Therefore, it would be interesting to include face shields as used in our experimental study as part of strategies to reduce transmission within the community setting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control/instrumentation , Inhalation Exposure/prevention & control , Masks , Personal Protective Equipment , Aerosols , Humans
2.
Med Hypotheses ; 142: 109827, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-352336

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) is a contagious acute respiratory infectious disease whose causative agent has been demonstrated to be a novel virus of the coronavirus family, SARSCoV-2. A recent PRE-print study has showed a heme attack on the 1-beta chain of hemoglobin by COVID19. Beta-thalassemia results of a default in the hemoglobin beta-chain synthesis. 1,5% global population are heterozygotes for this disease. In this study, by a multiple linear regression, we have analyzed the evolution of COVID-19 infection in three Italian regions (Puglia, Sardinia, Sicilia) with different beta-thalassemic prevalences, in order to search a link. The results have showed that betathalassemic heterozygote population prevalence is correlated to immunity against COVID-19, by a regression. This paper is only for academic discussion, the hypotheses and conclusions needs to be confirmed by further research.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , beta-Thalassemia/immunology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Female , Hemoglobins/analysis , Hemoglobins/chemistry , Heterozygote , Humans , Immune System , Immunization , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Prevalence , Regression Analysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , beta-Thalassemia/complications , beta-Thalassemia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL